Geebs Coaching

Peer-reviewed study

Your food environment keeps prompting you

Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review

CravingsMeta-analysis2016

Source details

PubMed-linked citation target.

Authors
Boswell and Kober
Journal
Obesity Reviews. 2016.
Identifiers
PMID 26644270 · DOI 10.1111/obr.12354

Claim guardrail

What this page should prevent.

Avoid saying a cue forces eating. Say cues can raise craving and decision load.

Geebs coaching takeaway

The study only matters if it changes a behavior.

Kitchen setup is coaching, not a side note. Visible trigger foods create repeated decisions.

Content angles

Safe ways to translate it.

Your counter is a prompt

Make the easy option the helpful option

Craving is often a setup problem

Exact answer pages

Questions that cite this source.

Related Geebs pages

Weekly Science Drop

Get the next source before it becomes a post.

One study, one coaching move, and one guardrail so research turns into action instead of overclaiming.

Weekly Science Drop

Get one useful cravings study breakdown each week, with Kris's practical takeaway and the claim guardrail so you know what the research does and does not prove. No spam, no fake certainty, unsubscribe anytime.