Geebs Coaching

Peer-reviewed study

HIIT is not automatically better

High-Intensity Interval Training and Isocaloric Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Result in Similar Improvements in Body Composition and Fitness in Obese Individuals

CardioRandomized controlled trial2016

Source details

PubMed-linked study details.

Authors
Martins et al.
Journal
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2016.
Identifiers
PMID 26479856 · DOI 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0078

Honest limits

What this study does not prove.

Neither HIIT nor steady cardio is universally superior; population, dose, consistency, and recovery all matter.

Kris's practical takeaway

Here's what to do with it.

When calorie burn is similar, the best cardio format is often the one you can repeat and recover from.

Ways to use it

Safe ways to apply it.

Stop worshiping HIIT

Steady cardio is not lazy

Pick the cardio you can recover from

Related questions

Questions this research helps answer.

Related guides and studies

FAQ

Quick questions

What is the practical takeaway from this study?

When calorie burn is similar, the best cardio format is often the one you can repeat and recover from.

What does this study not prove?

Neither HIIT nor steady cardio is universally superior; population, dose, consistency, and recovery all matter.

Weekly Science Drop

Get one useful study each week.

One study, one coaching move, and one honest limit so research turns into action instead of overclaiming.

Weekly Science Drop

Get one useful cardio study breakdown each week, with Kris's practical takeaway and a clear explanation of what the research does and does not prove. No spam, no fake certainty, unsubscribe anytime.