Geebs Coaching

Peer-reviewed study

Protein source matters less than the whole plan, but quality still matters

Effect of Plant Versus Animal Protein on Muscle Mass, Strength, Physical Performance, and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

NutritionSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials2025

Source details

PubMed-linked study details.

Authors
Reid-McCann et al.
Journal
Nutrition Reviews. 2025.
Identifiers
PMID 39813010 · DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nuae200

Claim guardrail

What this page should prevent.

Do not turn this into animal-protein absolutism. The review found small muscle-mass differences and no clear strength or performance difference.

Geebs coaching takeaway

The study only matters if it changes a behavior.

Plant-based clients can build a strong plan, but they may need more attention to protein dose, source mix, leucine quality, and total daily consistency.

Content angles

Safe ways to translate it.

Plant protein can work, but plan it

Protein quality is a design problem

Do not let ideology underfeed muscle

Exact answer pages

Questions that cite this source.

Related Geebs pages

Weekly Science Drop

Get the next source before it becomes a post.

One study, one coaching move, and one guardrail so research turns into action instead of overclaiming.

Weekly Science Drop

Get one useful nutrition study breakdown each week, with Kris's practical takeaway and the claim guardrail so you know what the research does and does not prove. No spam, no fake certainty, unsubscribe anytime.